Research Proposal Review Management
Evidence-Based Review of Research Proposals, from Peer to Corporate Level
One platform to coordinate review teams, assess proposals against weighted criteria, and record institutional decisions with a full audit trail.
- Multi-Stage Review
- Weighted Criteria
- Consolidated Team Evaluation
- Full Traceability
Proposal Review Progress
Illustrative Review- 1Peer
- 2Department
- 3Center
- 4Council
- 5Program
- 6Corporate
- Relevance to research prioritiesPending
- Methodology and designPending
- Budget justificationPending
Example only. This is not live proposal data.
Live From the System
EIAR Research at a Glance
Up-to-date totals across all research centers. Only counts are shown, never names or proposal details.
Research Pipeline
2projects active
Momentum, Last 6 Months
4 proposals started|14 decisions recorded
0
Ongoing Activities
0% of 2 activities
0
Ideas Shared
From farmers and partners
0
Reviews Completed
93% approved
0
Research Centers
Taking part
Institutional Proposal Review
Six Review Levels, One Coordinated Workflow
Proposals move through technical and institutional review stages, with evidence, decisions, and accountability recorded at each step. Council review applies only where a research center has a council.
- Peer
- Department
- Center
- CouncilConditional
- Program
- Corporate
Level 1 of 6
Peer Review
Technical peer assessment of the proposal.
Inside Each Review Stage
From Individual Observations to One Official Evaluation
Within every stage, a review team assesses the proposal criterion by criterion. The rapporteur brings member observations together into a single consolidated evaluation, which the team leader approves and submits as evidence for the decision. Each criterion has an importance rating and an assessment from Not Met to Fully Met. Anything not met or partially met needs a recorded corrective action.
- 01
Proposal Enters Review
A submitted proposal is routed to the review stage that matches its level.
- 02
Team Records Observations
Review team members assess the proposal and submit their observations.
- 03
Leader Consolidates
The rapporteur records the official assessment for every criterion, with evidence, and the team leader approves it.
- 04
Decision Is Recorded
The locked evaluation becomes evidence for the stage decision and any required revisions.
Who It's For
Clear Responsibilities at Every Step
- Researchers
- Submit proposals, follow their status through each stage, and see the actions required for revision.
- Review Teams and Leaders
- Assess proposals against defined criteria, share observations, and prepare the official consolidated evaluation.
- Institutional Decision Makers
- Use consolidated evidence to make stage decisions at department, center, program, and corporate level.
Platform Capabilities
Built for Rigorous, Accountable Proposal Review
Multi-Stage Review Workflow
Move proposals from peer to corporate review, with council review where it applies. Every transition is tracked.
Review Teams and Leaders
Form teams, collect member observations, and let the leader consolidate them.
Weighted Criteria
Each criterion carries an importance rating for its review level.
Required Actions
Not met or partially met criteria need a recorded corrective action.
Locked Evidence
Completed evaluations are locked so decisions rest on a stable record.
Role-Based Access
Permissions follow institutional responsibilities, keeping reviewer details protected.
Audit and Traceability
Every assessment, decision, and status change is preserved and traceable.
In-App Notifications
Participants stay informed as proposals move between stages.
Also Part of the Platform
- Research Agenda Intake
- Research Project Management
- Progress Monitoring and Evaluation
Review Research Proposals with Clarity and Accountability
Sign in to submit proposals, take part in authorized reviews, and follow every decision through to the end.